No. The Supreme Court, like all courts, is immune from lawsuits. If they weren't, people would be suing constantly (someone is always unhappy with the outcome of a case), which would interfere with the justices' ability to make an impartial decision. There are enough obstacles standing in the way of impartiality already.
You would sue an attorney in civil court. They could also be tried criminally. The Supreme court is for appeals. They are the final appeals court. The last word n any subject.
missouri, and the supreme court
Dred Scott
You can ask for whatever you want. That doesn't mean you'll get it. Also, in most cases, you can't "sue in the Supreme Court". You would have to bring your suit in a lower court first. The Supreme Court is predominantly a review court; for the most part they look at lower court decisions and say "yes, that was right" "no, that was wrong" or "not exactly wrong, but not exactly right either, do it again."
There is only one court in the United States that has jurisdiction when one state sues another. The court that has jurisdiction in this process is the United States Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scot was that slaves were property and had no rights. This meant they couldn't sue in court.
This Supreme Court case was B. T. Man v.s. Sue Permanne
sure why not as long as he does not appear in his own suing session
States can sue each other for all reasons. However, in order for states to sue each other, they must go through the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.
In Dred Scott, the U.S. Supreme Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court.
The Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision in 1857 ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and had no right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and stated that the federal government could not regulate slavery in the territories.