yes
Representation should be determined by population. While the New Jersey plan proposed representation would be equal for all states. :)
The states were given equil amounts of representation, regardless of the population. That would mean the representation would be based on the individual states, and not the population.the New Jersey plan had 3 branches (legislatiure, Execultive, judiceal)the legislature is a unicameral(one house)it was proposed by William Pattersonthis plan was liked by the small population but rejected by the large population states
The plan that called for equal representation in Congress is known as the New Jersey Plan. Proposed during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the New Jersey Plan advocated for a unicameral legislature in which each state would have equal representation, regardless of size or population. This was in contrast to the Virginia Plan, which proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population. Ultimately, the compromise reached was the Great Compromise, which created a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate with equal representation for each state.
be impartial
The Virginia plan was an idea proposed for the decision on the amount of representation for each state in Congress. The Virginia Plan suggested that representation should be determined by population and size of the state. That plan was not passed because it clearly did not favor smaller states who would end up with very little representation in the government. The New Jersey Plan was a completely contradicting plan that suggested that representation should be equal no matter what the size or population of the state was. That plan was not passed either because it only favored smaller states and politicians from the bigger states believed they needed more representation because of their size.
The New Jersey plan stated that the larger states should have the most representation. This worried the smaller states that they would not be heard as much.
The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were proposed during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to resolve the conflict over how states should be represented in the new federal government. The Virginia Plan advocated for representation based on population, favoring larger states, while the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for each state, favoring smaller states. The conflict was ultimately resolved with the Connecticut Compromise, which established a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. This compromise balanced the interests of both large and small states in the new Constitution.
The Virginia and New Jersey plans were attempts to resolve the issue of how states should be represented in the new federal government during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Virginia Plan proposed representation based on population, favoring larger states, while the New Jersey Plan advocated for equal representation for each state, regardless of size, to protect the interests of smaller states. This debate ultimately led to the Great Compromise, which established a bicameral legislature with both population-based and equal representation.
To determine how legislators should represent jurisdiction in a legislative body.
The Virginia Plan, also known as the Large-State Plan, was the idea that opposed the New-Jersey Plan in that it expressed the idea that representation for the New Legislature should be based off of population (which would favor larger states) rather than have equal representation for the states.
The Virginia Plan basically was the idea that representation should be based solely on population. While this would be great for the largely populated big states, small states like Delaware and New Jersey would receive far less representation in Congress.
The New Jersey Plan provided for equal state representation in Congress unlike the Virgina Plan that was based on population. The New Jersey Plan provided for equal state representation in Congress unlike the Virgina Plan that was based on population.