Governors in all but seven states may exercise a line-item veto on bills that involve spending or taxing. Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Vermont are the seven states that do not allow the line-item veto.
The line item veto is used only in budget bills
Yes
Yes, because the line-item veto is the power of the Texas governor to reject only some provisions of a spending bill.
Line Item veto.
The Governor of Georgia does have line-item veto power. The Georgia General Assembly can override the governor's veto, with a two-thirds majority in each chamber.
No, the line item veto does not allow the governor of Texas to kill an entire bill. Instead, it enables the governor to selectively veto specific provisions or items within an appropriations bill while approving the rest of the legislation. This means the governor can eliminate particular funding allocations without rejecting the entire bill. However, the line item veto is limited to budget-related bills.
I know for a fact that California has "line-item" veto. Not sure if that's the same thing as item veto. Hope this helps : )
The line item veto allows the chief executive in this case, the governor to remove some spending items from the budge. Therefore, the governor of Georgia can make changes on the budget even after its approval.
Line item veto.
If a governor rejects only a portion of a bill rather than the entire thing, he or she has exercised a line item veto. This allows the governor to eliminate specific provisions or spending items from a bill without rejecting the entire legislation. Line item vetoes are often used to remove sections that the governor disagrees with or believes are unnecessary.
The governor of a state may veto an item of any type of bill without vetoing the whole bill. This action is called an item, line veto.