Gene Hackman
No. Mainly because the US government is set up so that no one person can ever have absolute power. Whether or not President Obama is a corrupt leader, he will never have absolute power and will thus never be a proper example of this quote.
no, we dont have absolut power since 1915 for the war of the revolution in 1910 before of the president venustiano carranza next to the power the president francisco i. madero and his phrase was "sufragio electivo no reeleccion"
no absolute power is not a conflict but it has conflicts in it.
A dictatorE.g. Hitler was a dictator but was addressed as the fuhrerOther titles used for designating absolute power can be king, queen, tyrant, Caesar, chairman, president, lord, and chief. It cannot be emphasized enough that some titles of those with absolute power can be disguised, such as the title of president....Conversely, all people with absolute power, can in fact have this power "on paper" but in practice, absolute power is not always enforceable, as example der Fuhrer ordered certain German generals not to surrender and they did in fact do so. This happened in WW2 by German generals in Russia.Also, the Emperor of Japan ordered all Japanese soldiers to fight to the death in Iwo Jima, and this order was disobeyed.
A government where absolute power is exercised can an an absolute monarchy, an autocracy or a dictatorship.
Absolute power: to have complete control over something.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The father had absolute power.
Yes the ordinance power give the president absolute power to summon all executive orders, its for the benefit of country law and order to have one supreme responsibility power where the bucks stop.
No she actually has very little power its more of just a rich person with a government job like the president kind of
A government by absolute and arbitrary power is a a dictatorship.