answersLogoWhite

0

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of the U.S. Congress said voters in these territories to choose whether they would allow slavery or not. Thousands of antislavery northerners went into Kansas and voted to forbid slavery, then returned home.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why did northerners head for Kansas After the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed?

they wanted to create a majority antislavery place


What does the term Bleeding Kansas describe?

the fighting between proslavery and antislavery groups in Kansasthe violent clashes between pro slavery and antislavery groups in the Kansas territory.


What does the bleeding Kansas describe?

the fighting between proslavery and antislavery groups in Kansasthe violent clashes between pro slavery and antislavery groups in the Kansas territory.


Who was an antislavery settler who led attacks on pro-slavery settlers in Kansas?

John Brown was an anti-slavery settler who led attacks on pro-slavery settlers to Kansas


Why did northerners and southerns go to Kansas after the Kansas-Nebraska act?

So the region would become a slave-free state


Is this True Antislavery groups in Kansas have their own elections and adopted a constitution that banned slavery?

Yes, it is true that antislavery groups in Kansas held their own elections and adopted a constitution that prohibited slavery. This was part of the broader conflict known as "Bleeding Kansas" in the 1850s, where pro-slavery and antislavery factions clashed over the status of slavery in the new territories. The Free-State movement aimed to establish Kansas as a free state, leading to significant political and social turmoil in the region.


What phrase was used to describe clashes between pro-slavery and antislavery groups?

Bleeding Kansas


What was in effect of the events in “bleeding Kansas?

Tensions and violence over slavery spread outside Kansas


Why did the antislavery supporters in Kansas started a rival government?

Antislavery supporters in Kansas established a rival government in response to the pro-slavery government that was formed after the controversial Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This act allowed settlers to decide on the legality of slavery in their territories, leading to violent conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas." The antislavery faction sought to assert their rights and establish a government that reflected their opposition to slavery, aiming to create a free state. This parallel government was a direct challenge to the pro-slavery establishment and illustrated the escalating tensions over the issue of slavery in the United States.


Is this True or false Antislavery groups in Kansas have their own elections and adopted a constitution that banned slavery?

True. Antislavery groups in Kansas organized their own elections and adopted a constitution that prohibited slavery, particularly during the turbulent period known as "Bleeding Kansas" in the mid-1850s. This was part of the broader conflict between pro-slavery and antislavery factions as they sought to influence whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. The actions of these groups were significant in the lead-up to the Civil War.


What is the Kansas state legislature?

The new Kansas legislature passed laws supporting slavery. Antislavery people refused to accept these laws. By January 1856, rival governments existed in Kansas, one for and one against slavery.


What was the response of antislavery forces in Kansas after the newbkansas legislature passed pro-slavery laws?

After the Kansas legislature passed pro-slavery laws in 1855, antislavery forces responded with strong opposition, leading to violent confrontations known as "Bleeding Kansas." They organized to establish their own governance, creating the Free-State movement, which aimed to counteract the pro-slavery laws and promote Kansas as a free state. This period saw significant conflict between pro-slavery and antislavery factions, as both sides sought to influence the future status of Kansas. The turmoil highlighted the deep national divisions over slavery and fueled tensions leading up to the Civil War.