crusaders took too much equipment.
No in the second crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
Well apparently it is called the noble crusade because everyone who went on the first crusade and the noble crusade were noble
it lasted longer
Which one? First crusade - 1095-1099 Second crusade -1145-1148 Third crusade - 1187-1192 Fourth crusade - 1202-1204
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
crusaders took too much equipment
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The First Crusade was the only successful Crusade.