Arthur describes Paris as a city that embodies beauty and romance, often highlighting its aesthetic charm and artistic ambiance. In contrast, he views London as more practical and bustling, with a focus on its historical significance and vibrant urban life. While Paris is often associated with leisurely experiences and cultural richness, London is seen as dynamic and industrious. Ultimately, Arthur appreciates both cities for their unique qualities but recognizes their distinct atmospheres.
Rome, definitly. London is in England which, if i might say, is VERY polluted. Paris is okay but Rome is less polluted. (Not by far though)
Both are amazing *-* But I prefer London, because there are so much amazing sights and you have to see it! Just amazing *-* And there you can speak english! In Paris not everybody can understand you! But if you can speak frensh really good than you are right in Paris! I would say first visit London and than Paris :)
some say it is london,milan,new york, and paris
Paris I would think because of the tower and bread 🥖
The legends say that King Arthur was killed.
Paris and London both boast a wealth of iconic landmarks, but the comparison depends on how one defines "landmarks." Paris is renowned for its unique attractions like the Eiffel Tower, Louvre, and Notre-Dame Cathedral, while London features the Tower of London, Buckingham Palace, and the British Museum. Ultimately, both cities have a rich array of landmarks, making it difficult to definitively say that one has more than the other. It often comes down to personal preference and cultural significance.
A´ohe like me ´oe
The legends say that King Arthur was killed.
J'arrive a Paris
À Paris.
Arthur is spelled the same in French.
we love Paris = nous aimons Paris