annexation of territories from Spain!
Annexation any other country is never morally justified. Unfortunately, military strong countries in the past often casted a envious eye on a weaker country.
An annexationist is an advocate of annexation, the addition or incorporation of annexed territories.
The Beveridge speech, delivered by Senator Albert Beveridge in 1898, is significant to the annexation movement because it articulated a strong rationale for American imperialism, particularly the annexation of the Philippines. Beveridge argued that it was the United States' duty to civilize and uplift "lesser" nations, framing annexation as a moral obligation and a means to expand American influence. His passionate rhetoric helped galvanize public support for imperialist policies and justified expansionist actions during a pivotal moment in American history. This speech exemplified the expansionist mindset that characterized the era and ultimately contributed to the annexation of territories.
An annexion is an obsolete term for an annexation, the addition or incorporation of something, or territories which have been annexed.
...feared admission of the new slave states.
The United States justified the annexation of the Philippines by citing the need for strategic military positioning in the Pacific region and the desire to bring American democratic ideals to the Filipino people.
the capture and annexation of canada
the capture and annexation of Canada
Preventing the colonization of China Continental expansion into Mexico and Canada The annexation of Panama
Preventing the colonization of China Continental expansion into Mexico and Canada The annexation of Panama
The term Roman annexation refers to the annexation of territories to the Roman Empire as a Roman province. Sometimes newly conquered territories were annexed to the empire immediately. However, often, the territories were turned into client states by installing a ruler who was favourable to the Romans or they became allied kingdoms. Effectively, this was a form of indirect rule. This term refers to ruling a territory via local rulers who were subordinate to the Romans (or other imperial powers later in history). Over time, most of these client states and allies were annexed to the Roman Empire; that is, they became provinces of the Empire and came under direct Roman rule.