Japan is bigger with 377,873 square kilometers while England has 130,357 square kilometers. SO it is about 2,9 times larger.
Read more: Is_Japan_bigger_than_england
India and Nepal are not numbers, so they can't be directly compared. You mustfirst specify some characteristic that can be numerically compared.Area:India's area is 21.72 times as great as Nepal's area.Population:India's population is 39.92 times as great as Nepal's population.Population density:Nepal's population density is 1.32 times as great as India's population density.Birth rate:Nepal's birth rate is 1.07 times as great as India's birth rate.Highest elevation:Nepal's highest elevation is greater than India's but we don't have the numbers.
Australia is around 2.3 times the size of India, but India's population is bigger.
Yes, but only because they have nuclear weapons. India is almost ten times bigger so it would win against Pakistan.
the north
The peoples republic of China is nearly three times bigger than India in terms of area. China is 3.7 million square miles, India is 1.3 million square miles.
Texas is approximately 9 times bigger but has only 2,5 times the population.
No, California is bigger in terms of area, but not in terms of population. Japan has about 3.4 times the population of California.
Ruffly 10 times the population
India is approximately 22 times larger than Nepal in terms of land area. India covers about 3.287 million square kilometers, while Nepal's area is around 147,516 square kilometers. This significant difference highlights the vast geographical scale of India compared to its smaller neighbor, Nepal.
No it is more then 6 times as big. Japan - Population: 127,288,416 (July 2008 est.) Australia - Population: 21,007,310 (July 2008 est.)
Russia's population is larger than Canada's. It has just over 4 times the amount of people that Canada has.
Egypt has a land area 7.75 times the size of England and a population 1.5 times as large.