The legend of Rome's founding, which centers on Romulus and Remus being raised by a she-wolf, is a blend of myth and historical elements. While it captures the spirit and cultural identity of ancient Romans, the actual origins of Rome are likely more complex and involve various tribes and settlements. Archaeological evidence suggests that Rome developed gradually from various influences rather than from a singular legendary event. Thus, while the legend is significant in Roman culture, its historical accuracy is questionable.
No. A legend is a story that is believed to of happened. It could possibly be true, but most of the time legends are exaggerated as they are passed down from generation to generation.
The duration of True Legend is 1.92 hours.
True Legend was created on 2010-02-09.
As a general rule, if it's called a "legend", it's not true.
i believe that a myth is a not true story and a legend is a belief beleived to be true.
Yes, the rumor is true there will be a def jam street legend.
cos if you think about it , they can then know what animals were around before we were here then they can know if the legend is true or not LOL.
i do not know but i think its a no but it could be 5% possible that its true I'm just a kid
no romes was bigger
there is no such thing as a real legend a legend by definition is something that is half-true for example there is proof that there was a city called troy and that it was destroyed in war but the kidnapping of helena (that was her name i think) the curse of the conquerors and the trojan horse is most likely a pile of horse crap
no it is not true
I don't think the legend is true. From what i understand a girl got lost and a guy showed up. What proof do you have?