Shocking, my father was a POW from the Dutch Indonesian army and he Had many storeys of starvation, torture, summary execution, and the worst slave labour conditions that you could imagine. How bad the treatment was however often depended on the character of the commander of the camps they were interned in. Suffice to say that prisoners of war taken by the allies did not starve to death or die as a result of deliberate policy from the leadership.
hirsoshima and nagasaki where nuked because it was thought that these cities did not have any allied POWs in them continal bombs where dropped all over japan and tryed to hit places like factories to knock out japans war material production
At POW camps in Japan.
The Geneva Convention is the meeting that set standards for how POWs were to be treated. The atrocities of World War II prompted the treaties agreed to in 1949 to include a clause for the humane way to fight a war.
3 minutes
US POWs in Europe were treated with respect and accorded the treatment under the Geneva Convention(s). In the beginning of WW2, US POWs in the Pacific were treated as soldiers that had broken the code of honorable fighting men, and had chosen surrender over fighting to the death. Coupled with the humidity and starving conditions of vast travelling areas of obtaining resupply of food, medical supplies, equipment, etc. living conditions/treatment of US/Allied POWs was extremely harsh; especially when compared to conditions experienced by ETO (European Theater of Operations) POWs.
1952, after Japan gained its independence from the allied powers in 1951.
Germany & Italy were allied to Japan in WWII.
Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.
Horribly, in some cases, some POW were tortured for MONTHS!
The POWs that were posted to build the Burma railway endured unimaginable conditions. Starvation was common and many troops died from malnutrition and disease. No medical facilities were available for the soldiers, resulting in thousands of deaths on the railway. The scars which the POWs received would stay with them both physically and mentally forever. They should be treated with the utmost respect and admiration for what they went through. They were lucky to get out at all. I notice that neither of the above answers talks about the brutal way in which the Japanese guards treated the Allied POW's. Beatings were common, and many prisoners were killed by being kicked to death, or by being be-headed with a sword. No limits were placed on the punishment, by the Japanese officers, who considered the POWS to be "unworthy " of respect because they had "surrendered " instead of fighting and dying. A Allied POW held by the Japanese was 9 times more likely to DIE, than if he was a German prisoner of war.
Allied powers* because they were attacked by Japan.
Allied and Axis vicories reffer back to WW2. Allied sides were: everyone against Germany and Japan. Axis victory were: Japan and Germany