Typically the person who hit you would be liable, but the situation and context may mitigate this.
If YOU are the driver of the vehicle that started the chain collision, and pushed the car you hit into the car in front ot it. - YOU are responsible.
There were two tornadoes in the state of Washington in 2011.
It varies from state to state. In California the renter is responsible for any and all damages regardless of fault. It's up to the renter to go after the person that caused the damage.
The driver has the sole responsibility as they were behind the wheel.
Hard to say. Possibly equal fault by both parties but most likely the person backing out.
Typically the person who hit you pays. If they don't have insurance, your no fault insurance will pay for it.
you need to file a claim against their insurance company- anyone who hits you from behind was not alert enough to stop in time- unless this is a fraud most people who are hit from behind should not be at fault
The State isn't responsible for keeping track of the deer. And the driver should have been driving more carefully.
The car that hit you from behind.
Are you saying that you are uninsured, and the drunk was at fault, if simply due to the fact that you were uninsured (and of no fault whatsoever), you have to pay for his vehicle? NO, the ''at fault/negligent" party is liable/responsible for the damages they caused due to their neglience. Subject to any laws in your state barring uninsured drivers/owners from recovery of damage. But just because you are uninsured (if not at fault) you are not responsible for the drunks damages.
Think about this your are backing up, and your neighbors little boy is playing in your yard, and he isn't supposed to be in your yard and you hit him, (a) did you see him? can you hit him because he is not supposed to be there? We are responsible to know what is behind us and be aware of where our car is going. Two wrongs do not make it right. I think you are responsible for hitting a car that is behind you when your are backing up.
Hurricane sandy did not impact Washington D.C. directly, but the city felt some effects of the storm, including strong winds and rain. Sandy never went anywhere near the state of Washington.