Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
there are more rules in military than civilian
Civilian government is generally considered better than military government because it promotes democratic principles, such as accountability, human rights, and the rule of law. Civilian leaders are typically elected by the populace, ensuring that governance reflects the will of the people, whereas military governments often rely on force and coercion. Additionally, civilian governments tend to foster political stability and economic development by encouraging civic engagement and participation in decision-making processes. This can lead to more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to the often authoritarian and repressive nature of military rule.
A civilian regime refers to a government that is predominantly made up of civilian leaders who are not part of the military. In a civilian regime, power is usually vested in elected officials and civilian institutions, rather than military authorities.
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
Yes, military doctors can be sued, but the process is different than suing civilian doctors. The doctrine of "Feres v. United States" prohibits active-duty military personnel from bringing medical malpractice claims against the federal government. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as cases involving civilian employees of the military or medical treatment provided to dependents of military personnel.
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
If we're speaking of the United States, the answer is yes.In fact, they must be imprisoned by a non-military court. Any military court that attempted to exact justice on a civilian in the United States would be in violation of the Constitution and it would be tantamount to a coup or revolution.The military in the United States is not at liberty to do anything more than detain a civilian, which they are then required to turn over to a civilian court.Any action that came against a member of the US government would have to come from a non-military organization in order to be deemed even remotely legal.