The debate over banning 1080 in New Zealand centers on its environmental and ethical implications versus its effectiveness in controlling invasive species. Proponents argue that 1080 is crucial for protecting native wildlife, particularly birds, from pests like rats and possums. Critics, however, raise concerns about its potential harm to non-target species and the broader ecosystem. Ultimately, any decision should weigh the ecological benefits against the risks and explore alternative pest control methods.
80%
58
No, in the US, ferrets are also banned in New York City, NY and the state of Hawaii. They are banned in Portugal, some parts of Australia, New Zealand and in Singapore
This is a question of opinion.
Yes it should because We should do it in New Zealand not Toronto
Canada, The u.k, Australia, new Zealand and the United States
Slaughter without prestunning has been banned in Norway, Sweden and New Zealand.
The brushtail possum's main method of control that is used at the moment is 1080, a poison which kills ineffectively
DDT cannot be used in New Zealand. New Zealand has signed and ratified the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants which includes DDT. DDT was prohibited from use on New Zealand farmland in 1970, and its production and sale for all other purposes was banned by law in 1989.
Yes. It should be National Library of New Zealand.
New zealand should not become republic because
If you are targetting New Zealand you should go for a web hosting company in New Zealand.