yes
Antarctica should last as long as the earth lasts.
Yes we should exploit Antarctica, although many people think that we should conserve Antarctica as it is the last untouched and unpolluted continent, it is an extremely remote continent with no permanent residence. There is no wildlife around the centre of Antarctica therefore meaning we could easily exploit around the centre without effecting wildlife or the environment
I think Antarctica.
no because it is the only area left which me haven't exploited to death and it should be kept that way. We should not be mining resources (oil/coal) in the very place which suffers when we use it. it is ridiculous. We should instead be working hard to improve the efficiency of renewables. Good answer but pros : It will give us the minerals and resources we are fast running out of and could hold answers or information undiscovered before, like new spieces found in the ice etc... Cons : It is a very delicate ecosystem which is already being damaged by global warming and is the only place which is still untouched in the world, it gives us loads of info like our carbon emmissions by absorbing carbon dioxide and without it we'd be screwed, besides it is bloody freezing and would be really expensive to get there, it is also uninhabitable
A day in Antarctica lasts 24 hours.
Antarctica The Last Continent - 1986 TV was released on: USA: 1986 (limited)
Mt Erebus is more or less permanently active, and could be considered the last volcano that erupted in Antarctica.
The last continent to be inhabited was Antarctica.
it is mt.erebus
Antarctica, in the 1800s, was the last continent to be discovered by Europeans.
The first continent to be discovered is South America, and not Antarctica. Antarctica was the last continent to be discovered.
NO. Last I heard, Los Angeles was still part of the United States, which is protected by the 2nd Amendment.