answersLogoWhite

0

No because they will just attack us.they already have to many nuclear weapons they dont need anymore.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Should nations have the freedom to develop nuclear weapons?

Any answer to this question would be pure opinion, but I sincerely believe that nations should not have the freedom to develop nuclear weapons. The more nations that have them, the more likely it becomes that they will be used.


Why India should not go for nuclear weapons?

India already has nuclear weapons.


Should the UK have nuclear weapons?

No one should have nuclear weapons! I agree they cause nothing but problems. All they do is grant people power to kill and strike fear in the world. There is nothing good that can come from nuclear weapons.


Should you destroy all nuclear weapons?

nuclear weapons should not be destroyed they should be improved by my finding in 2023 there will be an alien attack on the united states of america, #getpussy


Should other nations be concerned about India and Pakistan testing nuclear weapons?

Yes hence the word NUCLEAR WEAPONS


Should the Indian government encourage nuclear weapons for the security of the country?

India is already a nuclear power, and they have nuclear weapons on hand. They have already made the decision to "encourage" nuclear weapons, and presumably for increasing their own security.


Should you bomb Iraq with nuclear weapons?

I do not have the power to bomb anything or anyone. As for whether anyone should use nuclear weapons, I am fervently opposed to that idea.


Do you think That Muslims should use nuclear bombs?

I believe no one should use nuclear weapons.


What type of training school should one have to work with nuclear weapons?

The US military has Special Weapons Schools where you learn how to operate, maintain, etc. nuclear weapons.


Should you be using chemical weapons in the war should be allowed?

no


Should North Korea be allowed to build nuclear weapons?

North Korea has already built nuclear weapons. So it doesn't really matter whether anyone believes that they should or shouldn't be allowed to do so. The next question would be, should North Korea be allowed to keep its nuclear weapons? It would be better to overthrow the Kim dynasty and take away the nuclear weapons and introduce democracy and reunification with South Korea, but those things would be very difficult to do. The existing dictatorship is heavily armed and will fight to the death to prevent its own replacement by better government. So, we play a waiting game. If North Korea becomes sufficiently dangerous, the world will react. For now, it is mostly bluster. North Korea has promised to launch missiles against the US, but so far it has not done so.


Should nuclear weapons be a part of today's world?

yes