Virtual representation was the concept that British members of Parliament represented the interests of all British subjects, including those in the American colonies, even if they did not have direct representatives in Parliament. This idea suggested that Parliament had the authority to speak for the colonies, as they were part of the broader British Empire. However, this notion was widely rejected by American colonists, who argued for actual representation and voiced their discontent over taxation without direct electoral representation. Ultimately, this tension contributed to the growing calls for independence.
England believed that since parliament represented the British Empire as a whole, all the colonies of the British Empire were virtually represented in parliament, even though they did not have any real representatives specifically for any of them.
England used the concept of virtual representation to argue that the interests of the American colonists were adequately represented in Parliament, even though they did not have direct representatives. This theory posited that all members of Parliament represented the entire empire, including the colonies, regardless of whether colonists could vote for them. Consequently, the British government believed that it was justified in imposing taxes and laws on the colonies without their consent, claiming that their needs were considered through this broader representation. This rationale ultimately fueled colonial discontent and the demand for direct representation.
The reason King George and Parliament did not give the American colonists representation in the legislature is because they did not consider the colonists citizens of England, but rather inhabitants of a British colony.
list of grievances against the king of England and the british parliament list of grievances against the king of England and the british parliament
Women are better represented in the Scottish Parliament compared to the UK Parliament due to the use of a proportional representation electoral system in Scotland that can help increase diversity among elected representatives. Additionally, there are dedicated efforts in Scotland to promote gender equality and encourage more women to participate in politics.
Very angry!
Because they did not like being taxed when they weren't represented in Parliament.
Issues between King Charles I and British Parliament were the driving force behind the English Civil War. Charles wanted total rule of England, while Parliament was determined that the people be represented.
In the British ruled colonies, Britain had a polcy of Parlaimentary virtual representation, which meant that the colonies were represented through someone living in Britain based on a particular commonatily. For example: All shoemakers in colonial new England were virtually represented by a British showmaker. The colonists were angered at the Mother countries policy of virtual representation because they were forced to pay taxes withour being actually represented in Parlaiment. The colonist marched through the streets shouting "no taxation without representation!". Tis is the main difference between the two. I hope this helps.
Issues between King Charles I and British Parliament were the driving force behind the English Civil War. Charles wanted total rule of England, while Parliament was determined that the people be represented.
Freedom from Tyranny. The King of England was continuing to charge outrages taxes for everything needed by the colonists. There was no representation of the colonists in British Parliament.
Robert Hannay has written: 'History of the representation of England ... and of the jurisdiction of the House of commons, to ..' 'History of the representation of England, drawn from the records' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons, Reform, Representative government and representation