It started as a monarchy, became an oligarchy, then a tyranny, then limited democracy, then an oligarchy, then a radical democracy, then a limited democracy.
Authoritarian
The answer is democratic
dictatorial
democratic they copied the greeks
No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.No, neither Nero nor any other Roman emperor was "democratic". The principate was an authoritarian institution.
The Roman Republic was neither authoritarian nor democratic. It was oligarchic.
democratic authoritarian monarchy
Athens was a democracy in part of the 5th and 4th Centuries BCE.
democratic and authoritarian
athens
The question aims at highlighting the point why do authoritarian Governments ( specially in Asia) try to control the media.
Athens valued education and intellectual pursuits more than Sparta, which focused primarily on military training and physical prowess. As a result, Athens attracted more philosophers who were interested in engaging in philosophical discussions and developing new ideas. Additionally, the democratic system in Athens provided greater freedom of expression compared to the more authoritarian government in Sparta.