No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings
because nepal is contiguous in india, india is colonized by british so nepal is british as you can see the people in india and nepal they are differeces like there suits and cultural dance.
There are no British colonies in the US.
the british established colonies along the rivers
PILCHOWK
they won nepals
No, Nepal is not a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. Most members of the Commonwealth were once part of the British Empire and Nepal was never part of that Empire. Nepal remained an independent nation throughout its history. It fought against the British Empire in the Anglo-Nepalese War(1814-1816) which ended in the Treaty of Sunauli, resulting in a huge loss of of territory on the Nepali side but the British acknowledged Nepal's sovereignty and independence.
Several, the obvious ones include Quebec and the British but others include the HBC, the British Colonies to the south, the Indians (aboriginals), and other European powers. Each would have their own perspective.
the British ruled the whole world except nepal
how did Spain feel about french and british colonies in the sothest
Which side won the battle of the colonies & British
it was the same as the BritishObviously the the governments of many former British colonies are base on the British system of government and law. That and in some instances influences that came from the original culture and religion.
The colonies under the administration of the British government were collectively known as the "British Empire." More specifically, the American colonies were often referred to as the "Thirteen Colonies" prior to gaining independence. These colonies were governed directly by the British crown and were subject to British laws and regulations.