answersLogoWhite

0

The assessment of whether Rana rule or Shah rule was better in Nepal depends on various perspectives. The Rana regime (1846-1951) is often criticized for its authoritarianism and the suppression of democratic movements, while the Shah monarchy (which began in the 18th century and continued after the Ranas) faced challenges in balancing modernization with traditional governance. Some argue that the Ranas brought a degree of stability and modernization, while others believe the Shahs, especially post-1951, aimed for democratic reforms. Ultimately, the evaluation varies based on political, social, and economic viewpoints.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?