The assessment of whether Rana rule or Shah rule was better in Nepal depends on various perspectives. The Rana regime (1846-1951) is often criticized for its authoritarianism and the suppression of democratic movements, while the Shah monarchy (which began in the 18th century and continued after the Ranas) faced challenges in balancing modernization with traditional governance. Some argue that the Ranas brought a degree of stability and modernization, while others believe the Shahs, especially post-1951, aimed for democratic reforms. Ultimately, the evaluation varies based on political, social, and economic viewpoints.
The Rana rule in Nepal was founded by Jung Bahadur Rana, who established his family's hereditary prime ministership in the mid-19th century. After a power struggle and the Sukh Naran Treaty with the British in 1857, he effectively consolidated power, sidelining the Shah monarchy. Jung Bahadur's rule marked the beginning of a century-long dominance of the Rana family in Nepal's politics, characterized by autocratic governance and limited political freedoms.
Rana Bahadur Shah was born in 1775.
Rana Bahadur Shah died in 1805.
After Prithvi Narayan Shah, the first King of unified Nepal, his son King Pratap Singh Shah succeeded him. Pratap Singh Shah ruled from 1775 until his death in 1777. Following his reign, the throne passed to his younger brother, King Rana Bahadur Shah.
the prithivinaryan shah unified Nepal
Prithvi Narayan Shah
ruler of shah dynasty - Prithvi Narayan Shah
Unfortunately, the thirteenth king of Nepal was late king Dipendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev
Prithvi Narayan Shah made great contribution to Nepal. He turned the small Gorkha states into a free united Nepal.It was his achievements that we have a greater Nepal today.So, Prithvi Narayan Shah is considered as the builder of modern Nepal.
12
Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev was the last king of Nepal.
Ram shah