What are some Long term effects of the Armenian genocide?

Who rescued the Armenians in the Armenian genocide?

The Germans and some Kurds

Why did the world ignore the Armenian genocide?

not all of the world ignored the Armenian genocide, infact there are many countries who believe the Armenian genocide happened (which is great) only some of the major countries (like U.S.A) stilll don't believe that the genocide happened, because Turkey is one of the major countries of the world and America is friends with them, so i guess that's why they ignored the Armenian genocide, plus, people are saying " It happened already! Why do we have to care about something that happened in 1915?!" Well, I'll tell you why, this genocide led to many genocides that were influenced by the Ottoman Empire, Like the Jewish Genocide, and Darfur, And Rwanda. It's all about power, and Turkey is powerful.

Is the Armenian Massacre a genocide?

Acording to İnternational law it is not a genocide. There is no an international court decision that is rules the 1915 events as a genocide but politicians and some historians. (There are some other historians and politicians which are doesnt agree with them)

What major event shaped Armenia?

The Armenian genocide shaped armenia because some of the land in Turkey used to be Armenia

How did the United Nations react to the Armenian genocide?

The United Nations did not exist at the time of the Armenian genocide, which occurred between 1915 and 1923. However, in the years following World War II, the UN has recognized the importance of preventing such atrocities and has established conventions, like the Genocide Convention of 1948. The UN has also acknowledged the Armenian genocide through various resolutions and statements, particularly in the context of promoting awareness and historical recognition. Despite this, the UN's actions have often been limited by political considerations and the reluctance of some member states to formally recognize the genocide.

Significance of the Armenian genocide?

The Armenian Genocide, which occurred between 1915 and 1923, is significant as it marks one of the first modern genocides, where the Ottoman Empire systematically exterminated 1.5 million Armenians. It serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of unchecked nationalism and ethnic hatred, influencing international law and human rights discourse. This tragedy has had lasting effects on Armenian identity and diaspora, while also highlighting the importance of acknowledging historical atrocities to prevent future genocides. The denial of the genocide by some nations continues to impact diplomatic relations and discussions around accountability and recognition.

What was the outcome of the attempts to try Ottoman war criminals after the Armenian Genocide?

The attempts to try Ottoman war criminals after the Armenian Genocide were largely unsuccessful. In 1919, the Ottoman government initiated trials known as the "Independence Tribunals," which found some officials guilty, but many of the key perpetrators escaped justice. The trials were criticized for their lack of fairness and were ultimately seen as insufficient, leading to a sense of impunity among those responsible for the genocide. By the early 1920s, most of the accused had fled or were not held accountable, and the issue of justice for the Armenian Genocide remains contentious to this day.

How much land does Turkey owe to Armenia?

Depending on the Armenian speaking, the Armenian homeland was up to 10% of the land of Turkey. However, since the Armenian Genocide, the land has become so devoid of Armenian people, Armenian culture, and Armenian buildings of importance (like churches and castles) that almost no important Armenian actively tries to have the land repatriated to Armenia.

How is the population coping with the aftermath of the armenian genocide?

The population coping with the aftermath of the Armenian Genocide has engaged in various efforts to preserve their cultural identity and memory, including education, memorialization, and advocacy for recognition of the genocide. Many Armenians maintain strong ties to their history through cultural practices, literature, and art. Additionally, the diaspora plays a crucial role in raising awareness and seeking justice, while some communities continue to confront the trauma through counseling and community support. Overall, the resilience of the Armenian people is evident in their commitment to remembering and honoring their ancestors' suffering.

Who were the Armenians' allies in the Armenian genocide?

During the Armenian Genocide (1915-1923), the Armenians primarily sought support from the Allied Powers, particularly Russia, France, and Britain, who were engaged in World War I. However, the Allies were often preoccupied with the war and were unable to provide substantial military assistance. Some Armenian groups also looked to local Christian populations for support, but many faced hostility instead, as the genocide was largely perpetrated by the Ottoman government and its military forces. Ultimately, the Armenians found themselves largely isolated in their struggle for survival.

What government allowed the Armenian genocide to happen?

The Armenian Genocide was thought, designed and executed by the Ottoman Empire government. The European , as well as the US government were the witnesses of these tragedy. Actually there are overwhelming evidence about this in the archives of foreign ministeries of these countries. They helped in small ways - like opening orphanages, small hospitals, several French and British ships saved some groups.

Why is the Armenian genocide not considered a genocide by some people?

Most people around the world do consider the Armenian genocide to be a genocide. However, there are some opinions that run counter to this mainstream view, especially in Turkey where successive Turkish governments deny it and have jailed those who say otherwise. Turkey has also made declaring the Armenian Genocide to be a genocide to be economically disadvantageous to any nation which openly states it, preventing many nations from coming out against it. The Turkish position, and the position of those who believe similarly, hold that a genocide has two components. The first necessary component of a genocide is the singling out of one or more races for worse treatment than the remainder of the population. This worse treatment must be harsh enough to be considered repressive or oppressive and not merely having fewer rights. Most Turks acknowledge that the Armenians faced incredible hardship during their forced relocations and evictions that would satisfy this requirement. The second necessary component of a genocide is the intent and execution of a plan to eliminate the singled out race from the planet or, barring that, from any territory claimed by the genocidal power. This is where Turks often say that the Armenian case falls short. While Turkish soldiers were unconscionably brutish, belligerent, and murderous, there was never a top-down order or insinuation that the Armenians should be exterminated. The fact that many died was due to the appalling conditions under which the forced relocations and exodus were performed. This view does not acquit Turkey of its actions, but puts it in the same ballpark as the Trail of Tears in the 1820s in the United States: an atrocity that is not quite a genocide. As noted before, this view, namely that the Armenian genocide is not a genocide is a minority view. Most claim that there is sufficient documentation to establish that the Ottoman Empire intended to exterminate the Armenian people (and thus fulfill the second necessary component of a genocide). The massacres that followed were in accordance with those orders.