The Burmese generally viewed Europeans with a mix of curiosity, suspicion, and resentment. While some admired European technology and culture, others saw them as intrusive colonizers threatening their sovereignty and way of life. This ambivalence often led to a complex relationship marked by both collaboration and conflict, as the Burmese navigated their interactions with European powers. Overall, the attitude was shaped by historical contexts and individual experiences.
A dominant one
His attitude toward the other party was contemptible.
The fundamental attitude of Hayes and other republican administrators toward labor agitation was to send all of the laborers to the death camps.
It all depends on who is in charge. Whoever leads and has the power of Rome would determine the attitude toward other religions.
Tone
The Treaty of Tordesillas revealed that Europeans believed they had the right to divide and control non-European lands and people without their consent. It reflected the attitude of superiority and entitlement that Europeans held towards other regions of the world during the Age of Exploration.
He was treated very poorly and mean.
It is not clear from your question whose attitude you are asking about, although the inference is that it is a god. Could be Zeus, who knows. The attitude of Zeus toward humans would have to be described as paternalistic. His attitude toward other gods would be described as competitive.
They'll be a little jealous mischievous and sweet
Sensible. Don't judge other people no matter of the path they take.
The Green Party foundation is based on mutual benefits for all.
it depends by the attitude of the cat some will be very loving but some may want to kill the other one