As a general rule, no, they are not. HOWEVER, 'coercion' needs to be further defined to know whether or not it meets the legal threshhold.
Grave coercion is when a person forces another to commit a crime that is illegal under Penal Law. The person being forced was affected by violence, and the person forcing had no right to do so, as it was not under the authority of law.
yes, but it can be undone in court soon after
Coercion Records was created in 2003.
They tried coercion, but he still would not do what they wanted.
The three classifications of PFSTT are physical coercion, psychological coercion, and economic coercion. Physical coercion involves the use of force or violence to compel someone to engage in human trafficking. Psychological coercion involves manipulation, threats, or deception to control the victim. Economic coercion involves controlling a victim's financial resources or exploiting their economic vulnerability.
Voting is not a form of government coercion in my society.
Questioner needs to define what they mean by "coercion" -BUT- as a GENERAL rule, yes, coercion is usually considered unlawful conduct.
He doesn't respond well to coercion, so you won't get him to do something he doesn't want to do. Confessions that result from coercion are normally inadmissible in court.
The word coercion means getting someone to do something by making threats or otherwise forcing them to do it.
coercion
Coercion.