If the Spartans had defeated the Persians, it could have drastically altered the course of ancient history. A Spartan victory might have led to the establishment of a more militaristic and oligarchic hegemony in Greece, potentially stifling the rise of Athenian democracy and culture. The weakened Persian Empire might have faced internal strife or fragmentation, while a Spartan-led coalition could have expanded its influence throughout the Mediterranean. Ultimately, this shift could have resulted in different cultural, political, and military dynamics in the region, impacting the development of Western civilization.
If the helots defeated the Spartans, the Spartans, being defeated, could not do anything to them.
The Persians invaded mainland Greece and faced a combined fleet and army of some Greek city-states, including Sparta. The Persians were defeated at sea and on land.
The Spartans did not 'follow' the Persians - they were part of a blocking force which delayed the Persian army for three days, and had no effect on the following two-year campaign which defeated the Persians at the battles of Salamis, Plataia and Mycale.
No. Both were of Indo-European ethnic origin, but the Spartans were Dorian Greeks and the Persians were Iranians.
The Persians
No.
tambourine
The Persians greatest army was The Immortals. There were about 10,000 of them and as soon as one died another Immortal replaced him. They were all specially trained warriors. They also had smaller weaker army that were defeated at Thermopylae. The Greeks and Spartans were defeated though because a Greek spy told the Persians a way around the pass of Thermopylae and the Greeks and Spartans were surrounded.
The Spartans and the Persians
Persians.
The Persians .
oh yeah