The conflict between proslavery and antislavery factions in the United States, particularly in the context of Kansas in the 1850s, was known as "Bleeding Kansas." This violent struggle arose as both sides sought to influence whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state, resulting in numerous confrontations and bloodshed. The term encapsulates the broader national tensions leading up to the Civil War.
violent crime rate
The clashes between workers and big business during the 1880s and 1890s resulted in significant labor unrest, marked by strikes and violent confrontations, such as the Haymarket Affair and the Homestead Strike. These conflicts highlighted the growing divide between labor and capital, leading to increased public awareness and sympathy for workers' rights. In response, labor organizations gained momentum, advocating for better working conditions, fair wages, and the right to unionize, ultimately laying the groundwork for future labor reforms in the United States.
The southern states threatened to leave the Union because of antislavery talks.
The laws of SOME states, may make a distinction between 'violent' and 'non-violent' felon offenders when they are making certain decisions or taking certain actions (i.e.: expungement - pardon - etc) but many opther states (and the federal criminal code) make no such distinction - a "felon" is a "felon."
No. Federal law - meaning, it applies to ALL states and territories of the US, and DOES NOT vary between states - prohibits felons from purchasing, possessing, or having access to firearms and ammunition. There is no distinction made between violent and non-violent felons in this regard.
The U.S. antislavery movement viewed the annexation of Texas as controversial because Texas was a slaveholding territory, and its incorporation into the Union could potentially expand the institution of slavery. Many abolitionists and antislavery advocates feared that admitting Texas would set a precedent for further expansion of slave states, undermining efforts to curtail slavery's growth. Additionally, the annexation was seen as a way to increase Southern political power in Congress, threatening the balance between slave and free states. This conflict highlighted the deepening sectional tensions over slavery in the United States.
Antislavery supporters in Kansas established a rival government in response to the pro-slavery government that was formed after the controversial Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This act allowed settlers to decide on the legality of slavery in their territories, leading to violent conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas." The antislavery faction sought to assert their rights and establish a government that reflected their opposition to slavery, aiming to create a free state. This parallel government was a direct challenge to the pro-slavery establishment and illustrated the escalating tensions over the issue of slavery in the United States.
United States
Violent power struggles between various factions, notably the Genghisids and the non-Genghisid Oirads made some states reluctant.
Violent power struggles between various factions, notably the Genghisids and the non-Genghisid Oirads made some states reluctant.
Violent power struggles between various factions, notably the Genghisids and the non-Genghisid Oirads made some states reluctant.