Well.. I'm not too smart but ,
From the beginning of the year until the end of December, the sheqel (New Israeli Sheqel-NIS)
strengthened against the currency basket by 3.2 percent, and against the dollar by 0.2 percent.
The difference reflects the strengthening of the dollar against most other currencies in world
markets. Following the fluctuations and significant rise of the exchange rate in the last few
months of 1998 which took place against the background of the international financial crisis,
the foreign exchange market was relatively calm in 1999. In the first few months of the year
there was a trend of nominal appreciation of the NIS against the currency basket, with a
contraction of the distance from the lower limit of the exchange-rate band from 14 percent to
7.2 percent2. In the last few months of the year the sheqel depreciated against the currency
basket, to a level close to that at the beginning of the year (see Diagrams 1 and2). The band
widened from 31.8 percent at the beginning of the year to 35.5 percent at the end, the result of
the slopes of the upper and lower limits remaining the same as in 1998-6 percent and 2
percent respectively3.
In the first quarter of 1999, the NIS appreciated by 5.5 percent against the currency basket
despite the uncertainty caused by the announcement, at the end of 1998, of early elections for
the Knesset (Israel's parliament) and for Prime Minister. Even the crisis in Brazil in January
1999 did not cause pressure in the domestic foreign currency market. The renewed
strengthening of the NIS may be explained inter alia by the high differential between the
interest rate in Israel and those in other economies, and by expectations of relatively low
differences between their inflation rates. It can also be explained by the calm in foreign
currency and capital markets in emerging economies, which was maintained despite Brazil's
currency crisis, and by buoyant stock markets throughout the world, which gave rise to a
feeling of stability and attracted back to the domestic market foreign investors who had
reduced their activity as the global financial crisis worsened in August-October 1998. The
strength of the sheqel may also be due to a correction of the market's over-reaction to that
crisis. Against this background, and in the light of the reduction in inflation expectations to 5.5
percent in February and March, the Bank of Israel cut the rate of interest on its monetary loans
by 0.5 percentage points towards the end of February, and by another 0.5 percentage points at
the end of March. At the end of the first quarter, the rate of interest was still 3 percentage
points higher than in the last quarter of 1998, when the Bank raised interest by 4 percentage
points and thus prevented the steep rise in inflation expectations in that quarter from translating
into a rise in inflation.
From the second half of April till the middle of May, the NIS weakened against the currency
basket. This reversal was due to several factors, including greater political uncertainty due to
the approaching election on May 17. In the last week of April, foreign-currency-indexed
options traded on the stock exchange expired, a day after the Bank of Israel announced a
further reduction of half a percentage point in the rate of interest. As a result of the importance
attached to the price at which options are exercised (the representative exchange rate on the
date they expire), exchange-rate volatility can rise as the expiry date gets closer. Unlike other
occasions when options expired and the exchange rate remained stable, in this instance there
was depreciation during the morning of the expiry date, April 27.
Other factors which boosted demand for foreign currency in this period were the narrowing
of the differentials between the rate of interest in Israel and abroad (see Diagram3), and the
sale of some $ 90 million of bank shares to foreign investors. As the shares were a sheqel asset,
their purchase placed the investors in a position of currency exposure to the sheqel. To protect
themselves against this exposure, they bought dollars with NIS in forward transactions,
creating demand for foreign currency in the market. However, since payment was made in
foreign currency directly to the government, no counterweighing supply of foreign currency
appeared on the market.
From mid-May until mid-July, before the new government's economic policy had been
formulated, the NIS/dollar exchange rate remained stable. During this time the dollar
strengthened against the euro, reflected in the stronger trend of the NIS against the currency
basket; although this trend reversed in the run-up to the election, it strengthened again
thereafter, and the nominal exchange rate peaked on July 19, when the NIS was traded at a rate
7.2 percent above the lower limit of the band.
From the middle of July till the middle of October there was strong demand for foreign
currency, some of which was due to the uncertainty prevailing before the budget guidelines had
been determined, as well as falling prices in the capital markets of industrialized countries.
These declines were the result of expectations of monetary tightening in the US, expectations
which were realized, and of growing worldwide concern at the effects of the transition to the
year 2000. These considerations led various companies to bring forward their new financing,
and made investors switch to the most secure and liquid assets (this occurred mainly in the
months May-August). The rise in the rate of interest abroad on the one hand, and the lowering
of interest by the Bank of Israel (by 0.5 percentage points at the end of August) on the other,
narrowed the differential between domestic and foreign interest rates, which also contributed to
the strengthening of demand for foreign currency. The nominal exchange rate reached its
highest level of the year in the second half of October when the NIS was traded at between
12.2 percent and 13.7 percent above the band's lower limit.
Despite a cumulative rise of 6 percent in the average currency-basket exchange rate in
August and September, inflation expectations responded with a rise of only 1 percentage point,
from 4.8 percent in July to 5.8 percent in September. In contrast, depreciation by a similar
amount (6.7 percent) in August-September 1998 led to a 3.1 percentage point rise in inflation
expectations. This may indicate that the relation between exchange-rate fluctuations and
inflation expectations has become weaker than it was in the past, although there is still a clear
link between them. The loosening of the link between inflation and the exchange rate in a
floating-exchange-rate regime is a function of the central bank's commitment to achieving the
inflation target and the extent to which the public believe that the Bank will succeed in fulfilling
this commitment. In such a situation, a rise in the exchange rate beyond a rate consistent with
the inflation target will cause the public to sell foreign currency, in the knowledge that the
central bank will act-by raising the rate of interest-to achieve the inflation target. Sales of
foreign currency will lower the exchange rate, making a rise in the interest rate unnecessary.
From the second half of October until the end of December the trend of the currency-basket
exchange rate reversed, with the NIS appreciating by 4.4 percent in that period. This
development was affected by the buoyant trend in stock markets world wide, and specially in
the US, and the lessening of concern regarding the transition to the new millennium. Other
factors directly associated with Israel's economy also helped the strengthening of the NIS,
including the resumption of peace negotiations with Syria and improvements in Israel's credit
rating. The calm in the foreign currency market continued despite several events that could
have caused concern, such as the announcement in mid-November of the impending resignation
of the Governor of the Bank of Israel. Evidently the public expects the anti-inflation policy to
continue, in the light of the Prime Minister's declaration that the policy pursued by the Bank of
Israel in the last few years would be maintained. This assessment by the public encouraged
investment in the NIS. The confidence which the public has in the anti-inflation policy was also
reflected by the continued downward trend in inflation expectations and actual inflation in this
period. Against this background, and in the light of the calmer international financial situation,
the Bank of Israel reduced the interest rate further-by 0.3 percentage points at the end of
November, and by 0.5 percentage points at the end of December. The calm continued into the
new year as the fears regarding the millennium bug dissipated, and with the announcement of
the intention to appoint David Klein as the new Governor of the Bank.
The American dollar is currently worth 1.0202 in Canada.
No, Israel does not use the Euro. It has its own currency, the Shekel. Israel is not part of the European Union and has no plans to join.
The Israeli currency is called the shekel.
No. You must use the local currency: the new sheqel.
Ukraine's currency is called hryvnia, and is worth about a quarter.
Euro
Jerusalem's current currency is the New Israel Shekel (NIS) or shekel for short.
$1.00 (US) is worth .726850 Euro (the currency in Cyprus)
It was 16th Century currency, no longer in use. Worth about $5.00
16th Century currency no longer in use. Worth about $5.00
The rates change every day. Use this currency converter to calculate it.
Puerto Rico has US currency, so they use US Dollar and its worth what the USD is worth.