"Cons" and "pros" refer to the negative and positive aspects of a decision, situation, or argument, respectively. "Pros" highlight the benefits or advantages, while "cons" point out the drawbacks or disadvantages. This terminology is often used in decision-making processes to weigh different options and understand their implications. Analyzing pros and cons helps individuals make informed choices by considering both sides of an issue.
the writer is to tell to the readers the prons and cons of the article. differentiate between the facts fromassertions.
The prons are that due to seniority one automatically is considered for promotion. However, the con of the promotion could be that the employer could hire someone new and pay a much lessor salary which will be a con to the person with the seniority.
Its wen da weiner goes into da sphincter and den da magik hapen. You see the pros and cons of doing such an action.
well because there would be less people in the world and there are prons and cons on for example less population more food and land cons freedom also saftey of the child
Public chat rooms are advantageous because they promote freedom of speech. A disadvantage to a chat room is the fact that many people say whatever comes to their mind.
With Build-a-lot a person can flip a house and make some money off of it. Usually making more profit than what they spent. The cons would be that a person may have to spend more than what the house will be worth to sell, or the house may not sell.?æ
Pros of bilateral aid include direct control over how funds are allocated, enhanced relationships between donor and recipient countries, and tailored assistance to meet specific needs. Cons include potential for donor countries to exert undue influence over recipient countries, lack of coordination with other aid efforts, and the risk of aid being used for political purposes rather than development.
because there are too many prons on the internet
Do you mean "loaning" or "leasing"?
It's French.
You mean, like Michael Vick?
how can v say that media is bad when v have no such evidence? whose making us aware off the government policies the various events taking place all the world over the prons and cons of media are decided by the viewer and not by critics weren't warrss taking place crimes on their peaks bfore media came into action?