answersLogoWhite

0

Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the most effective response to aggression to collective security?

Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .


What is the most effective response to aggressive-appeasement or collective security?

Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .


Was appeasement or collective security the most effective response to aggression before World War 2?

Collective security was ultimately the more effective response to aggression before World War II, as it aimed to unite nations against acts of aggression through mutual defense agreements. However, the failure of the League of Nations and the lack of commitment from major powers weakened this approach. In contrast, appeasement, particularly by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany, emboldened aggressive states and allowed them to expand unchecked, leading to the war. Thus, while both strategies were employed, collective security had the potential for effectiveness that was undermined by the failures of appeasement.


What is the most effective response to aggression-appeasement or collective security?

In the context of World War II, including the years just prior to its outbreak in 1939, the historical record is generally quite clear: the most effective response to the aggression of nations such as Germany and Italy during the 1930s would have been collective security -- galvanized by the will to take military action when necessary. While appeasement proved effective in buying time for Allied preparations for war, it did so at the cost of territorial losses, betrayal of national sovereignty (in the case of Czechoslovakia), and a strengthening of the aggressor-nations.


What was the response to axis aggression in the 1930 by western democracies?

The response to axis aggression in the 1930s by western democracies was appeasement.


What policy did Britain and France initially adopt in response to Germany aggression?

Appeasement


What was the response of the league of nations to Japanese and Italian aggression How effective was this response?

The League of Nations was the precursor to the United Nations. The greatest failing of the League of Nations is its absolute inaction in response to aggression prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.


What is the most effective response to aggression?

The most effective response to aggression often involves staying calm, setting boundaries, and seeking help if needed. It's important to prioritize your safety and well-being while trying to defuse the situation as peacefully as possible.


Why did the Western democracies adopt a policy of appeasement in response to Hitler's aggression?

there was three reasons 1- Britain did not want to go to war 2- They were buying time to build their army 3- Some agreed that the treaty of Versailles was harsh


Can you attribute crime to aggression or aggression to crime?

can you attribute crime to aggression or aggression to crime e.g. which one is a stimulus and is a response


According to the frustration-aggression principle the immediate response to frustration is aggression depression resignation or anger?

According to the frustration-aggression principle, the immediate response to frustration is anger. This theory suggests that when individuals are blocked from achieving a goal or desire, they are more likely to feel and express anger as a response.


How did Roosevelt response to German aggression toward Britain differ from his response to Japanese aggression toward China?

With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.