0
What is the precedent and legal requirements for obtaining admissible statements from the state of Illinois?
legal requirement for acquiring admissible statements because all the states require that evidence provided by the defendant be voluntary obtained from such a defendant without violation of any rights of a defendant. The only difference which has been observed in all the states is that in California, admissibility of statement depends on the decision of the judges unlike in other states where admissibility of statements is based on the circumstances under which the statement was obtained and application of the law concerning obtaining of evidence from a defendant or a witness. From a personal perspective, the most interesting concept regarding admissibility of statements in these states is that the rights of the defendant are highly observed while obtaining any form of information from the defendant. His shows that, despite the defendant being the one who is usually accused for committing a certain offence, he or she does not cease to be a human being and should therefore be accorded all the rights that a human being is entitled to.
What else can I help you with?
What are the consequences if accused are not read her Miranda rights?
If somebody is not read her Miranda rights, she might incriminate herself during questioning. Anything she says will not be admissible as evidence in court. This precedent was set by the supreme court in 1966.
What two types of precedent are there in doctrine of precedent?
binding(mandatory) precedent persuasive precedent
What is the concepts of ratio decidendi and obiter dicta?
Ratio decidendi refers to the legal reasoning behind a court's decision that forms the binding precedent in future cases. Obiter dicta are statements or opinions made by the court that are not essential to the decision and do not create binding precedent, but may provide guidance or insight on the case.
An appeal to precedent is a type of?
an appeal to precedent is a type of an appeal to precedent is a type of
What case established the precedent that true statements about public officials could not be prosecuted as libel?
The Crown v. Peter Zenger, New York, November 2, 1734
To what extent are precedent are binding or not binding?
it depends on how old the precedent is, how closely related is it to the case you are looking at and the difference between your precedent and crown/defense lawyer's precedent
Should you say set a precedence or precedent?
precedent
What term describes a ruling in an earlier legal case that is similar to a current case?
Precedent
What does it mean when a judge uses precedent to arrive at an opinion?
precedent
A precedent-setting court decision that produces substantial changes both in the understanding of the requirements of due process and in the practical day-to-day operations of the justice system is?
That is a Landmark Case.
Precedendts by the Albemarle Paper Co v Moody?
Abermarle Paper V Moody established the precedent that items used to validate job requirements must themselves be job related.
How do you put precedent into a sentence?
This to a large extent sets a precedent for the rest of the exhibition
