Connectiicut has has 702.9 per square mile based on the 2010 population count. North Dakota has only 9.3 per square mile.
According to the US Census Bureau, as of 2010, North Dakota has 9.8 people per square mile while Massachusetts has 835.2 people per square mile. So, North Dakota has fewer people per square mile than Massachusetts.
183,272 square kilometers in North Dakota
South Dakota has a larger population density with more people per square mile compared to North Dakota. This is due to factors like larger urban areas and more developed infrastructure in South Dakota.
No. South Dakota is larger with a total of 77,116 square miles while North Dakota has a total of 70,698 square miles.
Minnesota has 84,397 square miles. North Dakota has 70,704 square miles. South Dakota has 77,122 square miles. Total square miles for all three US states is: 232,223 square miles.
Ashley, North Dakota is 0.6 square miles and has 749 residents.
IIt had 9.3 residents per square mile in 2010.
Square dance is the official state dance in North Dakota.
South Dakota is a state in America's Midwest region. The demonym used to describe the 800 000 residents is 'South Dakotan'. Thus, a person from South Dakota should be referred to as a South Dakotan.
Oh, dude, North Dakota is the bigger sibling here. It's got more square miles than South Dakota. So, if you're into vast open spaces and endless fields, North Dakota is your jam. But hey, they're both pretty chill, just like me.
Rhode island.Rhode island:1018 (2010)North Dakota: 9.7 (2010)