Oh, dude, some people used the theory of "social Darwinism" to justify the dominance of western nations. It's like survival of the fittest, but on a global scale, you know? They were all like, "We're just naturally superior, so it's totally cool for us to take over everything." Classic human ego at its finest.
Mostly to western nations and the neighbouring countries.
Exactly the same clothes as the people in other Western nations.
During the early 1700s, explorers opened up new continents to settlement by people from Western nations (i.e. the Europeans, as it was defined then). The term "Western" came to encompass nations and former colonies (such as the U.S., Canada, and Australia) which were populated mostly by immigrants from Europe and their descendants.
Many people in the US felt that the country had an obligation to bring democracy and freedom to other nations. This idea was often used to justify US military interventions and foreign policy decisions.
Using modern armies and technology to colonize South East Asia,
Alliance for Progress
No more than in any other capital city in other western nations.
Historically, Europeans often viewed African people as inferior, uncivilized, and primitive. This inaccurate perception was used to justify colonialism, slavery, and exploitation of African nations and their resources. These attitudes were driven by racism and a sense of cultural superiority.
Usually where the white people are....
By sending more people
Dominance
All nations attempt to justify whatever it takes to protect the nation and ensure survival. That is just true about nations. But democratic governments have the added responsibility of doing so in the open and justifying their actions to the people. That it is the people who are important is what makes a democracy a democracy. In a democracy the government is not the nation, the people are the nation.