I studied the case and never found an opinion by JFK.
"Laws" are not derived from "case law" - DECISIONS of the court are derived from case law. Additional information: Case law in Ohio is established by having written opinions of court cases published in one of the appropriate Ohio Official Reports. The three official reporters in Ohio are the Ohio Supreme Court Reports, Ohio Appellate Reports and, for trial court cases, Ohio Miscellaneous Reports. All Ohio Supreme Court opinions are published; however only those appellate and trial court opinions that the Ohio Supreme Court Committee to Review Reporting of Opinions approves for publication are published. Once an opinion is published in the official reports, it becomes precedent for future cases having similar sets of facts under similar legal grounds. The precedential authority of a reported opinion is what makes it "case law." Opinions which are not approved for publication have no such precedential authority and are not considered "case law."
Not enough specifics of the case are given in order to render an opinion.
Crime Stoppers Case Files Northeast Ohio - 2011 John Lundy Harun Frizzell Homicide 1-13 was released on: USA: 17 December 2011
In the US Supreme Court case, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the respondent (like a defendant) in the case was the State of Ohio. John W. Terry was the petitioner or appellant (like a plaintiff).Terry was appealing his criminal conviction in People v. John W. Terry, 95 Ohio L. Abs. 321 (Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County 1964), in which Terry had been the defendant and the State of Ohio had been the plaintiff.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)John Terry's trial (State of Ohio v. John W. Terry) was a criminal case, but the US Supreme Court case (Terry v. Ohio) involved police procedure as applied under constitutional law. Terry wasn't on trial before the Supreme Court; the Court reviewed whether Terry's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure had been violated and, if so, whether the evidence in his criminal case should have been suppressed under the Exclusionary Rule.If the the Supreme Court had held in Terry's favor, instead of Ohio's, the conviction would have been vacated and the case remanded to the trial court for a new trial, at which time it would have become a criminal case again.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Case Western is located in the state of Ohio.
This is not a "What" question, but okay. They would consult the case's dissenting opinion.
Majority opinion - Also called the "Opinion of the Court," this is the official verdict in the case that represents the vote of the majority of justicesPlurality opinion - In a case where no opinion received majority support, a plurality is the opinion joined by the most justices
The dissenting opinion.
yes
Crime Stoppers Case Files Northeast Ohio - 2011 Breaking and Entering Crime Spree Easterly Waste Water Plant Sabotage John Kearney Homicide 2-5 was released on: USA: 4 February 2012
dissenting opinion