The Han Dynasty had a very similar Social ranking as of the other Dynasties, It starts from the bottom Slaves/Peasants - Marketers - Nobles/Warriors - Emperor
fmkgm'
The social classes in China were divided by economic status. The classes were rulers, nobles, farmers, traders, craftspeople, and slaves.
Political struggles and social problems weakened the Han Dynasty. It fell in A.D. 220. China had no single ruler.
Political struggles and social problems weakened the Han Dynasty. It fell in A.D. 220. China had no single ruler.
I lik E pie
The three social classes in China under the Zhou dynasty are King, Nobles, and Peasants.
Family relations created pervasive social cohesion in both Rome and Han china since they were used as units for social ranking. The Han Dynasty had a Social ranking similar to other Dynasties. It started with the Slaves or Peasants then to Marketers followed by the Nobles/ Warriors and the top most being the Emperor.
its was different because unlike the Han dynasty its started from the most to the least of people. For Ex, in social class there's first emperor , his court and scholars who led government positions then they was the peasant who were second class. Then Third class is the artisans they produce items for daily life and last class were the merchants who just sell what the artisans made.
they were the people that would be in the social classes of ancient china
Class structure became more rigid
Because the people in inner china called themselves the Han people after the Han dynasty. The people that live in outer china are not Han people, the do not like Han.
Han ruled china by having a strong central government.