A Noble, a cleric or a peasant.
No, they were a class unto themselves.
No, because i would have wanted more out of it.
No, they were a class unto themselves.
Probably not, but Napoleon was facing the reality of the French Revolution.
Priests were not members of the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie was the economic class that owned the means of production (factories and stores) and employed the proletariat (working class). Although doctors and lawyers did not own means of production themselves, their income and lifestyle placed them in the same class as wealthy factory-owners. Priests, being outside the usual economic system, were not classified as either bourgeoisie or proletariat.
Good, but they considered themselves to be over taxed, unappreciated and misunderstood.
No, quite the opposite. The bourgeoisie would be overthrown by the communist revolution.
An average person is considered to be bourgeois, or part of the bourgeoisie.
During the French revolution, the bourgeoisie represented the 3rd estate of the Estates General. The 1st one was the Clergy (the church and all its representatives) and the 2nd was the nobility.
the proletariat would overthrow the bourgeoisie.
Karl Marx believed that all history was the history of class struggles and that the proletariat would overthrow the bourgeoisie.
The proletariat has historically attempted to overthrow the bourgeoisie in socialist and communist revolutions, with varying degrees of success. However, the complete overthrow of the bourgeoisie has not been achieved in all instances, leaving systems with varying levels of class struggle and power dynamics.