answersLogoWhite

0

More Than a New Discovery was created in 1967-01.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When was New Discovery created?

New Discovery was created in 2002.


Why was Columbus' discovery of the Americas more significant than the vikings?

because they saw more thing`s and new and instresting things in their lifes,!


What did The discovery of gold in New Zealand led to?

more immigration from Europe.


What led to the discovery of gold in new Zealand?

more Immigration from Europe.


What effect did the discovery that the ocean could be crossed have on europeans?

It made Europeans eager to explore new lands. More investments were aimed at exploration of new lands and discovery of new wealth.


Does the life before is better than the life today?

today's life is better than before as new inventions are done there are new technology and discovery


Where is legoland's new discovery center?

The new Discovery Center is in Manchester UK


Why do you need more than one scientist to make a discovery?

Because no scientific work is considered a "discovery" until it has been independently verified by several other scientists in different places. If their work verifies the original claim, then it is indeed, a "discovery" by the first scientist in question. If the work of the other scientists cannot verify it, or vary wildly from the first scientist's work, then it is not a new "discovery".


What are the new schools in Discovery Bay?

Discovery College


When was More Fun in the New World created?

More Fun in the New World was created in 1983-09.


How new sources if energy specifically coal contributed to industrial revolution?

Burning coal allowed the steam engine to pump water out of the mines. This allowed miners to dig deeper into the ground. Coal was a more efficient source of energy than wood, because it lasted longer. This discovery created more jobs in the mines because there was suddenly a higher demand for it.


Is comparing two dialogues and explaining why one is correct and the other is not an example of a discovery technique?

No, comparing two dialogues and explaining why one is correct and the other is not is not an example of a discovery technique. This is more of a comparative analysis or evaluation task to determine the accuracy or effectiveness of the dialogues, rather than a method for uncovering new information or insights which is typically associated with discovery techniques.