Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee.
The answer to this question is The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798.
States declare laws unconstitutional, not the Supreme Court.
The Kentucky Resolutions, authored by Jefferson, went further than Madison's Virginia Resolution and asserted that states had the power to nullify unconstitutional Federal Laws.
The resolves hinted that states had the power to nullify federal laws.
The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions of 1798.
None. The States do not have this right.
The Kentucky Resolutions, authored by Jefferson, went further than Madison's Virginia Resolution and asserted that states had the power to nullify unconstitutional Federal Laws.
nullify or cancel federal laws
States could nullify federal laws. That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws PLATOO against a loose interpretation of the constitution
The process of deciding on the constitutionality of federal laws was as yet undefined. Jefferson and Madison, convinced that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional, decided that state legislatures be given the power to "nullify" federal laws within those states. These resolutions were adopted, but only in these two states, and so the issue died. or That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws
The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions supported the idea that states had the right to nullify or reject federal laws they deemed unconstitutional. This philosophy, known as nullification, emphasized states' rights and limited federal power. The resolutions were a response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were seen as infringing on individual liberties.
Carolyn Mathiasen has written: 'The SEC and social policy shareholder resolutions in the 1990s' -- subject(s): Institutional investments, Law and legislation, Legal status, laws, Proxy, Social responsibility of business, Stockholders, United States, United States. Securities and Exchange Commission