0
Muller v. Oregon was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1908 that upheld the state's right to limit the working hours of women in factories and laundries. The case centered on a law in Oregon that restricted women to a maximum of ten hours of work per day. The Court, influenced by sociological data presented by Louis D. Brandeis, recognized the state's interest in protecting women's health and welfare, thereby establishing a precedent for labor laws that differentiated based on gender. This decision marked a significant moment in the intersection of labor rights and gender equality in the United States.
What else can I help you with?
What was the purpose of the muller v oregon case?
protect women rights
The 1908 case of Muller v State of Oregon was the precedent setting in that the supreme court?
The 1908 Case Of Muller Vs. State Of Orgeon Was Precedent Setting In That The Supreme Court
Who was Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court during the Muller v. Oregon case?
Muller v. Oregon, 208 US 412 (1908)Chief JusticeMelville FullerAssociate JusticesJohn M. Harlan IDavid J. Brewer (wrote the opinion of the Court)Edward D. WhiteRufus PeckhamJoseph McKennaOliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.William R. DayWilliam H. MoodyFor more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who were the lawyers involved in Muller v Oregon?
there were many lawyers including the late great tyler beentheredonethat Persinger who died from wounds receive in a bar fight at his victory party.
In the 1908 case of Muller v State of Oregon the supreme court ruled that since women were different from men?
it was constitutional for a state to pass legislation that gave women special protection in the workplace
What did the 1903 Muller vs Oregon uphold?
The Muller vs Oregon decision of 1903 justified usage of labor laws and sex discrimination during that time period. The ruling upheld Oregon's state restrictions in regards to the working hours of women and the interest of protecting women's health.
What did the 1903 muller vs oregon decision uphold?
The Muller vs Oregon decision of 1903 justified usage of labor laws and sex discrimination during that time period. The ruling upheld Oregon's state restrictions in regards to the working hours of women and the interest of protecting women's health.
Case that upheld protective legislation on the grounds of women's supposed physical weakness?
Muller Vs Oregon
What laws were passed during the progressive era?
The Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act Fair Standards Amendment The Equal Pay Act Muller v. Oregon - limits women's work hours Child Labor Laws
What did the 1903 Muller v Oregon decision uphold?
It relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws. The case upheld Oregon state restrictions on the working hours. The Muller v. Oregon decision upheld the Oregon law, passed in 1903, that said that women could work no more than 10 hours a day.
What did the US Supreme Court case Muller v. Oregon change?
Muller v. Oregon, 208 US 412 (1908)In Muller, the US Supreme Court upheld an Oregon state statute that limited the number of working hours for women "employed in any mechanical establishment, or factory, or laundry" to ten per day, holding that the state had a legitimate interest protecting women's health.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Why did curt muller claim the Oregon labor law was unconstitutional?
Curt Muller claimed that the Oregon labor law, which limited women's working hours, was unconstitutional because it violated the right to contract freely. He argued that the law discriminated based on gender, imposing restrictions on women that were not applied to men. Muller believed that such regulations undermined individual liberty and equal protection under the law. Ultimately, he contended that the law unjustly interfered with the employer-employee relationship.
