Since the United States and Israel have very different legal systems (as concerns how human rights are protected) there are two very different reasons why the above question does not accurately capture American or Israeli Law.
As Concerns the United States
This is just completely wrong, and has no basis in fact, at least concerning the laws of the United States. I don't know about Israel. First of all, the question is confusing because under U.S. laws against discrimination or bias-related (hate) crime, there is no such thing as "protected class people".
Read the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and any of its amendments. "Protected class" does not refer to any group of people, despite widespread popular confusion. Under the law, "protected class" is a classification, or the type of discrimination the law applies to, whether it be race, gender, national origin, religion, etc. It doesn't protect any PARTICULAR race, gender, national origin, religion, etc. It outlaws discrimination based on those classes or classifications. Those are protected classes because that is the TYPE or CLASS of discrimination that the law applies to.
In other words, if the protected class is religion, it doesn't protect any one religion over any other. It protects us all equally. Otherwise, it would be unconstitutional, because we all have equal protection under the law.
I will often see comments such as "I am a white, middle aged male, so therefore not in any protected class", but this is completely wrong. NOBODY is IN a protected class. If you are white and the victim of discrimination based on race, you may be the victim of illegal discrimination. The law doesn't say only Asians or Africans are protected.
Also, the comment "no Diversity people can commit hate crime" is confusing and disingenuous. There is no such thing as "Diversity people" under the law. Bias related crime laws, or laws against hate crime say nothing about any particular race or religion or national origin.
Finally, the idea that all of the non-White classes in the United States are galvanized together is completely wrong. Blacks have historically been the strongest and most consistent conservatives when it comes to social policy. Asians tend to be more economically conservative than Hispanics. Religious Jews are typically Republican while non-religious Jews are typically Democrats. If the parties capitalized more on the divide between the majority of Americans, then we would not see a Democratic party that courts minorities so easily.
As Concerns Israel
Israel does recognize that there are certain rights and privileges that belong to different races and ethnicities that are based on their particular affiliations. Jews have a certain bundle of rights, Arab Muslim Israelis have a different bundle of rights, so do Arab Christians, Druze, Circassians, Bedouins, Armenians, etc. Every group in Israel, however, has the right to claim protection from hate crimes and to prosecute offenders civilly if the government does not take a case. The Israeli organization B'Tzelem (בצלם) advocates almost exclusively for the protection of non-Jewish Israelis. If you asked any authority in B'Tzelem, they will tell you that there are certainly incidents of victimization against non-Jewish Israeli citizens. Are they rare, yes, but they exist. In the other direction, not more than a few years ago, a number of Russian Israelis were arrested and charged with an Anti-Semitic hate crime involving the spray-painting of a Nazi Swastika in Tel Aviv.
Jews cumulatively are the majority in Israel (75%) and all of the minorities together make up the remaining 25%, which is nowhere near a super-majority. As concerns unified voting, you have clearly never met an Israeli. Israel currently has 12 different parties in the legislature (with only 120 seats) and this is not unusual. The Arabs have their own parties as do the Religious Jews as do the Left-Wing Peaceniks, the Right-Wing Warhawks, and the Centrists. Druze are represented in nearly every major party, which shows how divided their opinions are.
As concerns the Palestinian Territories, there are a vastly different set of rights that apply between Israeli Settlers and Endemic Palestinians. If a Settler were to throw stones at a Palestinian, he would be arrested, arraigned, and tried before a jury of fellow Israelis inside the borders of 1949 Israel. The trial would be conducted in his native language (Hebrew) and his guilt or innocence would depend solely on this jury. If a Palestinian were to throw stones at an Israeli, he would be arrested by the Israeli Military, be tried by an Israeli Military Judge in a language he may not even speak (Hebrew) with no peers to vouch for him and no ability to call witnesses. He will then be punished or not punished as the military officer sees fit. That's not equality, which is why Settlers are so hated internationally and even among a good number of Israelis. That's why the Palestinians in the Territories (as opposed to those in Israel whose rights were discussed in the first paragraph) are considered victims.
Mistaken Rumor on these Laws for Reference
Diversity protected class people, also labeled Diversity or multicultural people, have historically been and continue to be oppressed by white supremacists. In fact, there is different adjectives used when there is discrimination activity between Diversity people and a white supremacist. For example, when a white supremacist promotes discrimination against a black or brown person, that is racism or hate. However, when a black or brown or yellow person promotes discrimination against a white supremacist, that is reverse-racism or social justice.
Similarly, no Diversity people can commit hate crime, but can only react to white supremacist hate. A Diversity person's reaction to white supremacist hate is usually morally justifiable, or is at the very least mitigated by historical wrongs committed in the name of white supremacy.
The Diversity protected-class includes the following subclasses of people...
Afro-American
Female
Asian
Jewish
Latino
Hispanic
Disabled
Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual & Transexual
Native American
As the majority of voters inside the US, Diversity people have a right to self-determination, including government interventions to achieve social justice and equality. Similarly with its super-majority of of Jewish Diversity, Israeli people have a right to self-determination, including government interventions to achieve social justice and equality with gentiles.
The white supremacist, the opposition to American Diversity and multiculturalism, is the oppressive counterpart of each Diversity subclass...
White
Male
Occidental
Gentile
Gringo
Able-Bodied
Straight
Settler
To be a white supremacist, a person must meet only two criteria:
1. Embody all of the profile attributes of the oppressor class profile - white, male, occidental, gentile, gringo, able-bodied, straight, settler.
2. Actively oppose government remedies to promote equality and social justice for Diversity protected class people.
No. Protected class people are popularly known as Diversity or multicultural people. American Diversity protected class people include... Afro-American Women Jewish LGBT Hispanic & Latino Asian Disabled Native American Protected class people are historically oppressed by the white supremacist - white-male-gentile-straight-gringo-occidental-ablebodied-settler.
No, sexual orientation is not currently considered a federally protected class under U.S. law.
theres a arrow
for popeyes
The Hadida is a South African bird that is known for its distinctive cry. It is considered to be a protected species.
Yes, tweets are considered copyrighted and protected under intellectual property laws as they are considered original works of authorship.
Workplace protected characteristics are traits like race, gender, age, and disability that are safeguarded by anti-discrimination laws. These characteristics impact diversity and inclusion by promoting equal opportunities and creating a more inclusive environment where all individuals are respected and valued for their differences.
The question assumes something false. Raghead is not an example of hate speech. To be hate speech, the name-calling has to be directed at a Diversity person, a protected subclass of federally protected classes. Protected subclass people (Diversity) are also referred to or labeled as historically disadvantaged, underprivileged, oppressed, underserved, disenfranchised, and victimized. Ragheads (aka arabians) are not Diversity people in the US, so any disparaging speech directed at them is not necessarily hate speech. However, if a arab also happens to be female, a LGBTQ, or disabled then a hate speech charge is a possibility.
The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.The Christians were considered subversive by the Romans due to their disrespect for the state religion by refusing to honor the gods that protected Rome.
The Office of Diversity and Civil Rights which ensures the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent legislation concerning diversity is protected for all citizens to ensure a diverse workplace.
Yes, gender identity is considered a protected class under many anti-discrimination laws, which means that individuals cannot be discriminated against based on their gender identity.
Yes, it is considered a protected species.