Popular sovereignty failed in Kansas due to intense political and social conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, leading to violence known as "Bleeding Kansas." The influx of both groups seeking to influence the outcome created chaos and lawlessness, undermining the democratic process. Additionally, fraudulent voting and intimidation further skewed the results, rendering the principle of popular sovereignty ineffective in establishing a peaceful resolution. Ultimately, the disputes heightened tensions that contributed to the onset of the Civil War.
popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska
The Kansas-Nebraska of 1854 allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebrask to vote on whether to allow slavery, which is what "popular sovereignty" or "squatter sovereignty" meant.
Popular sovereignty was used before the Civil War to determine if the state wanted slavery or not. Nebraska and Kansas voted on these issues.
Popular Sovereignty
popular sovereignty
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 called for "popular sovereignty."
Kansas-Nebraska Act
Kansas- Nebraska Act
Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois.
Popular Sovereignty
Popular sovereignty is when a majority vote within a region or state determines its policies. The Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 allowed popular sovereignty to decide whether a territory was to be a free state or a slave state.
'Popular Sovereignty' was the term coined by Stephen Douglas for a local vote on slavery in each new state as it joined the Union. It was the basis of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which was first tested - disastrously - when Kansas was admitted as free soil. This followed the unsuccessful Compromise of 1850, which did not involve Popular Sovereignty.