0
What else can I help you with?
Why do people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan?
Some say that Truman wanted to send a message to the Soviet Union - Apex
What do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945?
The attacks ended the war, but killed many civilians and alarmed the Soviet Union. ~ apex
Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 194?
some say that truman wanted to send a message to the soviet union
Why did people still argue the decision to drop atomic bombs on japan in 1945?
People continue to argue the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945 due to ethical concerns about the immense civilian casualties and suffering it caused. Critics argue that Japan was already on the verge of surrender, suggesting that the bombings were unnecessary for achieving victory. Additionally, the long-term effects of radiation and the precedent set for nuclear warfare raise moral questions about the justification of such actions. These debates reflect broader discussions about wartime ethics and the consequences of using weapons of mass destruction.
What effects still exist in Japan from the atomic bombs?
no effects still exist. Nukes leave a lot of radiation etc but not atomic bombs
Why so many people still argue about the decision of dropping the atomic bombs on japan in 1945 Apex?
The decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945 remains contentious due to its profound moral, ethical, and historical implications. Critics argue that it caused unnecessary civilian suffering and question whether it was truly needed to secure Japan's surrender, while supporters contend that it ultimately saved lives by avoiding a prolonged conflict. Additionally, the bombings marked a pivotal moment in warfare and international relations, prompting ongoing debates about nuclear weapons and their consequences. These differing perspectives continue to fuel discussions about the justification and impact of the bombings.
What would have happened if the US invaded Japan with a naval landing instead of the atomic bomb?
a whole lot of people would have died, but we probably would have still won
Do people live in Japan still?
Yes!
How did dropping atomic bombs change the outcome of world war 2?
Atomic Bomb droppings onto Japan changed WW2 outcome as prior to it, Japan was still fighting strong and could of beaten the US. However, when Japan realised the US dropped 2 atomic bombs on August 6th and 9th, Japan was forced to surrender to the US like the Germans were forced to surrender to the Soviets.
What did the US do to japan due to the attack on pearl harbor?
Atomic bomb even though they killed more than 50x times the people instantly not including the radiation cancer which is still going on twoday
Why do people still argue about what happened to President Kennedy?
Because the real story has yet to emerge.
What effect did the bomb on Hiroshima have?
The bomb killed a lot of people and people in Japan are still suffering from the bomb till this day!
