Most historians believe there weren't many rats in England during the early medieval period due to the limited urbanization and the relatively low population density, which meant fewer opportunities for rats to thrive. Additionally, the colder climate and less developed trade routes may have hindered the spread of rats and their preferred habitats. It wasn't until later, with increased trade and urban growth, that rat populations began to flourish, particularly during the 14th century.
chicken
2
in many ways!!
A:I do not think there are any reliable statistics of the religion of historians. This probably reflects the fact that there is very little interest in knowing the religion of historians. Of course, there are many Christian theologians who use the Bible as a primary source of history, but they would not regard themselves as historians in the true sense.
he had many but there werent any in specific if you really think about everyone was just hatinggg :p
they werent that many soldiers
i think the rise of England is when England had full glory of the world. England may have founded many countries in the rise.
I don't think you can count rocks.
Soveit historians think that Lenin was infallible and that he translated Marxism to suit 20th century Russian conditions in 1917. they believe that the revolution was necessary and inevitable. the most significant part, according to soviet historians, is the transfer of power. they believe that the acts of terror were justified yet after 1991 many began to question Lenin's motives
I think 7990 Tom
i think there are 2,345,675.678 children
at my camp there are many people from England, i think there is a program called camp America