People do not primarily live in the Himalayan mountains due to harsh environmental conditions, including extreme cold, high altitudes, and difficult terrain, which make agriculture and infrastructure development challenging. Additionally, the region's remoteness and limited access to resources such as water and healthcare further deter settlement. The risk of natural disasters, like avalanches and landslides, also poses significant threats to habitation. As a result, the population is sparse, with most people living in lower, more accessible areas.
A Himalayan yak lives in Himalayan mountains.
Mountaingoat
The extreme high altitude, harsh weather conditions, limited access to resources, and lack of infrastructure make it difficult for people to live permanently in the Himalayan mountains. Additionally, the rugged terrain and risk of natural disasters like avalanches and earthquakes pose additional challenges for permanent settlement.
The Himalayan Mountains protected this area from wind erosion. Since the mountains blocked the wind, it was easier to grow crops and live comfortably.
they are nobody there mountains
The Himalayan mountains are on the border of Nepal and Tibet.
Mount Everest can be found on the border of Nepal and Tibet in the Himalayan mountains.
The Himalayan mountains are found in Asia.
The Himalayan are in the Northern and Eastern Hemispheres
I am not sure what you mean by "possible", but there are creatures that live on mountains such as a specialized white haired spider or as a plant there is the infamous Himalayan blackberries which were never that successful there, but were in the pacific Northwest.
A lot of fat to keep animals warm and thick fur.
No, snow leopards only live in central and southAsia along the Himalayan mountains. (Not counting Zoos)