Some people don't have any choice, they don't have enough money to move, and through slavorie and prostutotion , it helps provide barley enough money. This is the case for many people living there.
Business attracts people and then they make the best of it. Darwin in any case is not such a dangerous place. If people were afraid to live where there is an element of danger most of the world would be empty. Human nature tends to look beyond danger no matter where it is.
There is no square (place, area) called Bangladesh
Srimangal is the coldest area of Bangladesh, is recorded of -10.4°C as lowest temperature in Bangladesh. Killed 1320 people by the chilly cold wave. Snowfall is not available, only freezing fog is stretched with trees and gardens.
No, Bangladesh is not the wettest place on earth. Mawsynram in India holds the record for the wettest place on earth, receiving an average annual rainfall of over 450 inches. Bangladesh does experience heavy monsoon rains, but it is not the wettest place.
I think Bangladesh
Yes, if they have a pack there would be a lot there. Could be quite dangerous though if you go on their "property" if they get protective.
They have no safe place to go and do not want to leave their land. Many people live in remote areas and the warnings may not get to them.
It made an unhealthy place for the poor people who worked there, and the dangerous machinery injured many children.
A person who flees to a dangerous place is a Refugee
Lagos is naot a dangerous place man!
Bangladesh is considered a developing country with a low income level. While it has made progress in various sectors, poverty and inequality persist in many parts of the country. The GDP per capita is below the world average, indicating that it is more on the poorer side.
in bangladesh there are alot of flat lands so if they had dams it wouldnt come over because its not stronge enough