Probably because it isn't very close to a fault line.
No they are not, relatively few earthquakes have ever been recorded in Australia as it is a very stable continent with no active volcanoes and few if no earthquakes.
There are very few factories left in London.
Antarctica is a continent that experiences very few earthquakes due to its location on a stable part of the Earth's crust.
It depends which London you are talking about. London, England, is not experiencing any earthquakes, as England cannot actually have earthquakes.
Australia isnt on the edge of any tectonic plates
London has ghost because a lot of people died from the London fire (I think)which last for a few days and spread very far.
Big Ben is in London, England which doesn't have a problem with earthquakes.
Normally, when the word multitude is used in conjunction with earthquakes, it refers to the number of earthquakes, not their strength. The number of earthquakes is linked to the activity of the Earth crust. Because the activity of the Earth crust is very slow, it is very difficult to establish the highest multitude of earthquakes for a location. In a location there may not be earthquakes for thousands of years, then in a space of a few days the area could experience hundreds of earthquakes. There are locations which are very active today, which allows statistical studies. But the parameters are very dynamic. This is one of the reasons why it is not possible to predict earthquakes.
No. Most earthquakes last just a few minutes. It is rare for an earthquake to last more than a minute. The very strongest and longest-lived earthquakes may last for up to 5 minutes.
There are lots of towns very close to London. Guildford, Colchester Stevenage, Maidstone, Westerham and Dorking are a few of them.
No, pandas are not found in London. Pandas are indigenous to China, and a very few of them are loaned to zoos around the world.
We get them all the time, but feel very few. I can count on one hand the real strong quakes we have had in the last few years.