Hydroelectric can pretty much only be used where nature allows it. You need a fairly large river, and a good place to put a whopping huge dam across it.
because the conditions for a hydroelectric power stations in the uk aren't right so only a few can be built.
It makes very good sense for New Zealand to make much more use of hydroelectric power than the UK because New Zealand has more lakes which are situated high above sea level than the UK.
New Zealand generates more hydroelectric power than the UK primarily due to its abundant water resources and mountainous terrain, which provide ideal conditions for hydroelectric generation. Approximately 60% of New Zealand's electricity comes from hydro sources, leveraging its numerous rivers and lakes. In contrast, the UK's energy mix is more diversified, with a significant reliance on fossil fuels and nuclear power, resulting in a lower proportion of hydroelectric generation. Additionally, New Zealand's commitment to renewable energy aligns with its natural advantages in hydropower.
i don't now so haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Two-Solar energy and tidal energy.
Scotland is the best part of the UK for building hydroelectric power stations due to its abundant water resources, rugged terrain, and existing infrastructure for hydropower development. Additionally, the Scottish government has set ambitious renewable energy targets, making it a supportive environment for hydroelectric projects.
1005682.895
Eastern Europe
Around 10 million people in the UK are smokers according to sources in 2007
19'440'000 litres
As much as I know it's about 68%
Our major energy source in the UK is fossil fuels (coal oil and natural gas) which constitutes 2/3rds of our energy production Nuclear and renewable energy such as wind, hydroelectric and solar make up the remaining 1/3.