It became stronger, which is why it was able to take it over. Whether it was better is a moot point - better at what?
London is better than Rome on my opinion
Athens isn't better than sparta. its the other way around!!
No, Athens is not in the north of Rome. Athens is located in Greece where it is also the capital city.
Athens
All the emperors of Rome were, but Sparta and Athens were around long before there was an emperor of Rome.
Athens
Athens is the most furthest South, then Rome. Nice is the most North
Most boys had better education than military skillls
NO. Athens is in Greece and is the Capitol of that country. Rome is the Capitol of the country of Italy which is a few hundred miles west of Greece.
The Roman government was often considered more effective than Athens due to its structured system of checks and balances, which allowed for a more stable and enduring political framework. Unlike the direct democracy of Athens, where citizens voted on every issue, Rome developed a representative system with elected officials, enabling more efficient governance over a vast empire. Additionally, Rome's legal system, including the Twelve Tables, provided a consistent set of laws that helped unify diverse cultures within its territory. This combination of representative governance and a strong legal framework contributed to Rome's longevity and adaptability compared to Athens.
The two are not comparable.
If you are looking for what type of goverment system Ancient Rome had, then this would be a Republic, where citizens elected officials, that would create the law. In theory, yes, this would make Athens more democratic.