The federal ruling system in Nepal is crucial as it promotes decentralization and empowers local governments, allowing for more responsive and inclusive governance. It aims to address the diverse needs of various ethnic groups and regions, fostering social equity and political representation. Additionally, this system helps to mitigate historical grievances related to marginalization, thereby enhancing national unity and stability. Overall, federalism supports democratic practices and development tailored to local contexts in Nepal.
maintains a federal system of government and representation.
The federal ruling system is considered more democratic because of the division of power, and the various checks and balances put in place.
Federal ruling systems are more democratic and inclusive than unitary ruling systems because the government remains close to its people, encourages devolution of government resources, and bars dominance of the majority.
Although law professionals will tell you it is a separate system, it is not. The US Supreme court has ruled that these systems are separate in so much as they are bound by the State constitution, and the Federal constitutions as well as the rulings of the US Supreme Court. State courts cannot divert from a Federal Court ruling; if they do the US Federal Court system will overturn the ruling.
== == Because they just didn't make a federal system, in which the checks and balances would prevent one branch of government form over-ruling another.
adg
On State Courts of Appeal - their rulings are binding on the entire states court system. On the findings of a Federal Appeals Court - they are binding upon the federal district courts within THAT appeals courts circuit.
The two important precedents that were established for the federal government in the U.S. was a strong central government and a National Banking System
federal reserve system
dont get in trouble
opinion
democracy