answersLogoWhite

0

Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How do scientist conduct a scientific investigation?

They draft a hypothesis, investigate it. Next, they conduct several experiment's, if they can get good repeatable results others test it. Then it is improved or accepted and over time it may change or disappear completely.


Experiment and investigation must be A. approved B. unreproduceable c repeatable d accepted which is it?

C. Repeatable


Any method of scientific investigation is accepted on da basis of?

observation


How do scientists conduct scientific investigation?

They draft a hypothesis, investigate it. Next, they conduct several experiment's, if they can get good repeatable results others test it. Then it is improved or accepted and over time it may change or disappear completely.


Is a scientific hypothesis a accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?

If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.


What are three conditions that a scientific question must meet?

If , then, and because.


What is the important of the scientific method in science?

The importance of the scientific method is to find the universal truth in investigation & concluded through universally accepted experimental methodology.


What is the big idea implied in the skill or process of the scientific method?

That science is repeatable, testable, and accountable. A prediction must be tested to be accepted and it can be tested countless times to determine if it fails.


Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?

If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.


How did the Bohr model affect the scientific thought?

scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)


How did Bohr model of the atom affect scientific thought?

scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)


What must be true for a hypothesis to become widely accepted by scientist?

For a hypothesis to become widely accepted by scientists, it must be supported by robust and repeatable experimental evidence. Additionally, it should withstand rigorous peer review and be consistent with existing scientific knowledge. The hypothesis should also demonstrate predictive power and be able to explain a range of phenomena within its domain. Finally, it should be open to further testing and refinement as new data emerges.