yes, but there is some debate about whether is should not be a world park because it have very mineral rich soil underneath, which we now have the technology to get. This however, would make it a waste tip, so at the moment it's staying as a world park.
If Antarctica were a world park, It would be protected from HUMAN INTERFERENCE.
basically 50 cent said no.
Antarctica, ok make it into a world wilderness park. Nobody cares.
nothing
Antarctica is already protected -- all land south of 60 degrees S -- by the Antarctic Treaty. There is no reason to add the burden of a world park designation to this geography.
Yellowstone National Park became a world heritage site on September 8, 1978.
no.
Sagarmatha National Park was declared a World Heritage Site in 1979.
Antarctica is not a world park. All land and ice south of 60 degrees S is governed by the Antarctic Treaty (1961), which preserves the geography for the scientific study of the health of planet Earth.
Yes, the Kaymay Bay National Park should be a world heritage site.
Antarctica is the largest and coldest desert.
Grand Canyon National Park became a World Heritage Site in 1979.