I guess the rockies could if there were more earthquakes and continental shifts.
The Rockies have a lower elevation but higher latitude than the alps. So the alps are higher than the Rockies.
There are 54 mountain peaks in the Colorado Rockies that are higher than 14,000 feet.
Two other mountain ranges are the Himalayas in Asia and the Andes in South America.
The Rockies are higher in elevation than the Appalachians. The highest peak in the Rockies, Mount Elbert, reaches over 14,000 feet, while the highest peak in the Appalachians, Mount Mitchell, is just over 6,600 feet.
The Himalayas are the tallest mountain range in the world, with Mount Everest reaching a height of 29,032 feet above sea level. This makes the Himalayas significantly taller than other mountain ranges, such as the Andes or the Rockies.
The highest mountain among the options listed is in the Himalayas. Mount Everest, located in the Himalayas, stands at 8,848 meters (29,029 feet) above sea level, making it the tallest mountain in the world. In contrast, the highest peaks in the Rockies, Ural, and Andes are significantly lower than Everest. For instance, Aconcagua, the highest peak in the Andes, reaches 6,961 meters (22,838 feet).
The Rockie Mountains are 4401 meters high whereas the coastal mountains are 4019 meters high so the Rockies are 382 meters higher than the coastal mountains
The Rockies have higher elevations than the Appalachians. The highest peak in the Rockies, Mount Elbert, reaches over 14,000 feet, while the highest peak in the Appalachians, Mount Mitchell, reaches around 6,600 feet.
Nope
The snow was piled higher than the Himalayas; we would need Sherpas to guide us.
Yes. It can be higher or lower
Sort of. Giant Pandas live at the base or maybe a little higher than that at/of the Himalayas. So technically yes.